Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms EPYC 7452 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1532 days newer than EPYC 7452.
Advantages of EPYC 7452
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900KF - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 35% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7452 - 166 vs 123 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$416.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $416.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7530 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7452 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
155 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |