The EPYC 7402P is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-12900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7402P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 24 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-12900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 7402P vs Core i9-12900
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7402P
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
197
86%
Min 1% FPS
135
87%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-12900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
229
100%
Min 1% FPS
156
100%
Price, $
$431.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7402P vs Core i9-12900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7402P vs Core i9-12900 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7402P
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Core i9-12900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
30 MB
23%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7402P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-12900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $519.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Rome | Codename | Alder Lake-S |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 16 |
48 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 30 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
