The EPYC 7402 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $75.85 more expensive!
Advantages of the EPYC 7402
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 32 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-14900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 12% cheaper – $559.97 vs $635.82
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
EPYC 7402 vs Core i9-14900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
329
100%
Min 1% FPS
196
100%
Price, $
$559.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.7/FPS
100%
EPYC 7402 vs Core i9-14900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7402 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7402 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7402
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
58%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
28%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7402 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Not Available | MSRP | $524.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake-R |
180 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 24 |
48 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |