The EPYC 7302P is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8150. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7302P
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 125 vs 155 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 7302P vs FX-8150 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7302P
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
181
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EPYC 7302P vs FX-8150 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7302P vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7302P vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7302P
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7302P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Rome | Codename | Zambezi |
| 155 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
