The EPYC 7302 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9900K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $525.31 more expensive!
Advantages of the EPYC 7302
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-9900K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 63% cheaper – $314.64 vs $839.95
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 95 vs 155 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 7302 vs Core i9-9900K
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
208
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, $
$314.64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i9-9900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i9-9900K in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
66%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7302 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-9900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $488.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake-R |
| 155 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
