The EPYC 7302 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-4690 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $799.58 more expensive!
Advantages of the EPYC 7302
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-4690
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 94% cheaper – $50.42 vs $850.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 84 vs 155 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
EPYC 7302 vs Core i5-4690 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4690
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
140
100%
Price, $
$50.42
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
EPYC 7302 vs Core i5-4690 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i5-4690 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i5-4690 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-4690
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7302 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Rome | Codename | Haswell |
155 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |