The EPYC 7302 is the comparison's loser – it's at least much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-13400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $715.56 more expensive!
Advantages of the EPYC 7302
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-13400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 84% cheaper – $134.44 vs $850.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 65 vs 155 Watts
EPYC 7302 vs Core i5-13400F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
225
100%
Min 1% FPS
155
100%
Price, $
$134.44
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
EPYC 7302 vs Core i5-13400F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
62%
L3 Cache
20 MB
16%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7302 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $196.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake-S |
155 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |