The EPYC 7302 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-9100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $763.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the EPYC 7302
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 90% cheaper – $87.00 vs $850.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 65 vs 155 Watts
EPYC 7302 vs Core i3-9100F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
206
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, $
$87
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
EPYC 7302 vs Core i3-9100F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7302 vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7302 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $122.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 155 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
