Counter-Strike 2
1280x1024@240Hz·07:32 played
phucdanhtt3·1h ago
Public3 Tips
168
FPSAverage
122
FPS1% Low
37%/48°C
62%/55°C
32 GB
47%usage
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Xeon E3-1240
The Core Ultra 9 285 is much faster than the Xeon E3-1240 on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core Ultra 9 28571% Score
- Up to 215% faster on average across 100+ games
- Is 14 years newer
- Available for $579
FPS Comparison Across Popular Games
Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.
Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.
Base Frequencyhelp
Xeon E3-1240 has a 32% higher base clock.
LGA1851
Sockethelp
LGA1155Arrow Lake-S
Codenamehelp
Sandy BridgeDesktop
Segmenthelp
Server/WorkstationArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Integrated GPUhelp
No Integrated Graphics6400 MHz (DDR5)
RAMhelp
DDR3Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
Not OverclockableFrequently Asked Questions
compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core Ultra 9 285 or Xeon E3-1240?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285. It's 492% faster than the Xeon E3-1240 on average across 100+ games, scoring 71/100 vs 12/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285 than Xeon E3-1240?expand_more
492% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core Ultra 9 285 or Xeon E3-1240?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285 is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285 worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 71/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Core Ultra 9 285 and Xeon E3-1240?expand_more
Performance: Core Ultra 9 285 scores 71/100, Xeon E3-1240 scores 12/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Core Ultra 9 285 or Xeon E3-1240 bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core Ultra 9 285 or Xeon E3-1240?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285 is the stronger pick at 71/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.
Popular Comparisons
Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DUltra 9 285 vs Ryzen 7 9700XUltra 9 285 vs Ryzen 9 9900XUltra 9 285 vs Ryzen 7 7700XUltra 9 285 vs Ryzen 5 5500Ultra 9 285 vs Ultra 7 265KFUltra 9 285 vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DUltra 9 285 vs Ryzen 5 7600XUltra 9 285 vs Ultra 5 245KUltra 9 285 vs Ultra 7 270K PlusUltra 9 285 vs Ryzen 5 8500GUltra 9 285 vs Ryzen 5 4500Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DUltra 9 285 vs i3-6100Ultra 9 285 vs Ultra 5 225Ultra 9 285 vs i5-4690Ultra 9 285 vs i5-4670Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen 5 3500XUltra 9 285 vs Ryzen 5 7500FXeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DXeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 7 9700XXeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 9 9900XXeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 7 7700XXeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 5 5500Xeon E3-1240 vs Ultra 7 265KFXeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DXeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 5 7600XXeon E3-1240 vs Ultra 5 245KXeon E3-1240 vs Ultra 7 270K PlusXeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 5 8500GXeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 5 4500Xeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DXeon E3-1240 vs i3-6100Xeon E3-1240 vs Ultra 5 225Xeon E3-1240 vs i5-4690Xeon E3-1240 vs i5-4670Xeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 5 3500XXeon E3-1240 vs Ryzen 5 7500F