Valorant
1080p@240Hz·06:20 played
Guilherme_9d14·3h ago
Public
242
FPSAverage
235
FPS1% Low
37%/47°C
48%/62°C
32 GB
42%usage
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus vs FX-6300
The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is much faster than the FX-6300 on average across 100+ games. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $277.83 more expensive!
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus76% Score
- Up to 302% faster on average across 100+ games
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 77% better value for money
- Up to 127% more expensive – $318.48 vs $40.65
FX-63003% Score
- Up to 127% cheaper – $40.65 vs $318.48
FPS Comparison Across Popular Games
Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.
Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.
Base Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a 6% higher base clock.
Turbo Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 7 270K Plus boosts 34% higher.
LGA1851
Sockethelp
AM3+Arrow Lake Refresh
Codenamehelp
VisheraDesktop
Segmenthelp
DesktopArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
Integrated GPUhelp
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)7200 MHz (DDR5)
RAMhelp
1866 MHz (DDR3)Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
OverclockableFrequently Asked Questions
compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core Ultra 7 270K Plus or FX-6300?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. It's 2433% faster than the FX-6300 on average across 100+ games, scoring 76/100 vs 3/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 7 270K Plus than FX-6300?expand_more
2433% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core Ultra 7 270K Plus or FX-6300?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 76/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and FX-6300?expand_more
Performance: Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 76/100, FX-6300 scores 3/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus or FX-6300 bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus or FX-6300?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is the stronger pick at 76/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.
Popular Comparisons
Ultra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DUltra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 7 9700XUltra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 9 9900XUltra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 7 7700XUltra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 5 5500Ultra 7 270K Plus vs Ultra 7 265KFUltra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DUltra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 5 7600XUltra 7 270K Plus vs Ultra 5 245KUltra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 5 8500GUltra 7 270K Plus vs i3-13100Ultra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 5 4500Ultra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DUltra 7 270K Plus vs i5-4590Ultra 7 270K Plus vs Ultra 5 225Ultra 7 270K Plus vs i5-4690Ultra 7 270K Plus vs i5-4670Ultra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 5 3500XUltra 7 270K Plus vs Ryzen 5 5600FX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DFX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 9700XFX-6300 vs Ryzen 9 9900XFX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 7700XFX-6300 vs Ryzen 5 5500FX-6300 vs Ultra 7 265KFFX-6300 vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DFX-6300 vs Ryzen 5 7600XFX-6300 vs Ultra 5 245KFX-6300 vs Ryzen 5 8500GFX-6300 vs i3-13100FX-6300 vs Ryzen 5 4500FX-6300 vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DFX-6300 vs i5-4590FX-6300 vs Ultra 5 225FX-6300 vs i5-4690FX-6300 vs i5-4670FX-6300 vs Ryzen 5 3500XFX-6300 vs Ryzen 5 5600