In Battlefield 6, the Core Ultra 7 265K is quite a bit faster than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6 – 138 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Nov 05, 2020
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 105 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core Ultra 7 265K vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
138 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
103 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
103 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
77 FPS
75%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.61/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core Ultra 7 265K vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core Ultra 7 265K vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
47%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
60%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 24th, 2024 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$394.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1851 | Socket | AM4 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 6400 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
