HowManyFPS Desktop AppTrack Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Core Ultra 7 265 vs E-300

The Core Ultra 7 265 is much faster than the E-300 on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

All CPUs

Up to 714% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 13 years and 7 months newer
Available for $371.78

CPU

All CPUs

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

League of Legends2009

379FPS

60FPS

714FPS

172FPS

Overwatch 22023

Core Ultra 7 265

562FPS

E-300

583FPS

Rust2018

Core Ultra 7 265

347FPS

E-300

265FPS

Valorant2020

Core Ultra 7 265

754FPS

E-300

559FPS

Dota 22013

Core Ultra 7 265

279FPS

E-300

172FPS

Grand Theft Auto V2013

Core Ultra 7 265

221FPS

E-300

162FPS

Fortnite2017

Core Ultra 7 265

327FPS

E-300

370FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core Ultra 7 265

66%

E-300

Core Ultra 7 265 ranks 66 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core Ultra 7 265

E-300

Core Ultra 7 265 has 18 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core Ultra 7 265

E-300

Core Ultra 7 265 has 18 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Core Ultra 7 265

30 MB

E-300

0 MB

Base Frequencyhelp

Core Ultra 7 265

2.4 GHz

E-300

1.3 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265 has a 85% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

5.3 GHz

TDPhelp

65W

18W

E-300 draws 47W less power.

Pricehelp

Core Ultra 7 265

$371.78

E-300

Core Ultra 7 265E-300

LGA1851

Sockethelp

FT1

Arrow Lake-S

Codenamehelp

Zacate

Desktop

Segmenthelp

Mobile

Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU

Integrated GPUhelp

Radeon HD 6310

6400 MHz (DDR5)

RAMhelp

DDR3

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core Ultra 7 265 or E-300?expand_more

Neither, they're within 1% of each other across 100+ games. Pick based on price, availability, or platform compatibility.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core Ultra 7 265 or E-300?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265 is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 7 265 worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 66/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Core Ultra 7 265 and E-300?expand_more

Performance: Core Ultra 7 265 scores 66/100, E-300 scores 0/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Core Ultra 7 265 or E-300 bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core Ultra 7 265 or E-300?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265 is the stronger pick at 66/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Recent Public Benchmarks

View All

All GPUs

All CPUs

Popular Comparisons