In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core m7-6Y75 is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m7-6Y75
- Consumes up to 96% less energy – 5 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 96% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 40% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 132 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 40% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core m7-6Y75 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
132 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m7-6Y75 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m7-6Y75 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core m7-6Y75
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
4 MB
17%
Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
29%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m7-6Y75 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $393.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA1851 |
5W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
