In Counter-Strike 2, the Core m7-6Y75 is quite a bit slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m7-6Y75
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 5 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 91% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 45% faster in Counter-Strike 2 – 385 vs 265 FPS
- Up to 45% faster in Counter-Strike 2
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
Counter-Strike 2 FPS Calculator
Core m7-6Y75 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m7-6Y75 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m7-6Y75 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core m7-6Y75
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
34%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m7-6Y75 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $393.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA1700 |
5W | Power Consumption | 58W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
