In Control, the Core m3-6Y30 is same performance as the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 5 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 95% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3450
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
34%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | $241.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA1156 |
5W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
