In GRID, the Core m3-6Y30 is same performance as the Xeon E5649. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 5 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 94% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5649
No clear advantages
GRID FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Xeon E5649: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Xeon E5649 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Xeon E5649 in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
36%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA1366 |
5W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
