In Atomfall, the Core m3-6Y30 is slower than the Ryzen 7 8700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 5 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 92% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 8700F
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 238 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Apr 01, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Ryzen 7 8700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 8700F
Apr 1st, 2024
Average FPS
238 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
178 FPS
100%
Price, $
$248.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Ryzen 7 8700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Ryzen 7 8700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
22%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
44%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Ryzen 7 8700F
Apr 1st, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 8700F Apr 1st, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2024 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | $270.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | AM5 |
5W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
