In The Last of Us Part II, the Core m3-6Y30 is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 192 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 5 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 92% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 15, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 15th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
88%
Price, $
$560
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.29/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
36%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
39%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 15th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 15th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 15th, 2025 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA1851 |
5 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
