In Deathloop, the Core m3-6Y30 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Consumes up to 96% less energy – 5 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 96% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$438.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
28%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
37%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA1700 |
5 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
