In The Last of Us Part II, the Core m3-6Y30 is slightly faster than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 191 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 5 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 92% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
169 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
89%
Price, $
$529.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
45%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
39%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA1700 |
5 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
