In Atomfall, the Core m3-6Y30 is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Consumes up to 97% less energy – 5 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 97% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$450.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
21%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
24%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
47%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA2066 |
5 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR4 |
Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
