In Control, the Core m3-6Y30 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 5 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 92% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 249 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.23
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
30%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
47%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA1151 |
5 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
