In The Last of Us Part II, the Core m3-6Y30 is slightly slower than the Core i7-930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 96% less energy – 5 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 96% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 203 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
203 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
32%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA1366 |
5 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
