In Atomfall, the Core m3-6Y30 is slightly slower than the Core i7-4790. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 5 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 94% less energy
Core i7-4790
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 205 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i7-4790: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-4790
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
205 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i7-4790 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i7-4790 in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
25%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
55%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-4790
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4790 May 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | May 1st, 2014 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $312.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA1150 |
5 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
