In Control, the Core m3-6Y30 is slightly slower than the Core i5-12400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 5 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 92% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12400F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 252 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
22%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
36%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
50%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | $174.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGA1700 |
5 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
















































































































































