In Rust, the Core m3-6Y30 is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core m3-6Y30
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 211 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 5 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
Core i3-330M
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
208 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
39 FPS
91%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core m3-6Y30 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core m3-6Y30
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
0.9 GHz
42%
Turbo Frequency
2.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
57%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core m3-6Y30 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1515 | Socket | LGAG1 |
5 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 515 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
