In Atomfall, the Core M-5Y51 is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 96% less energy – 5 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 96% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 11 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 27, 2014
- Is 8 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core M-5Y51 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core M-5Y51 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core M-5Y51 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core M-5Y51
Oct 27th, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
34%
Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
43%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core M-5Y51 Oct 27th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 27th, 2014 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | LGA1700 |
5 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
