In Atomfall, the Core M-5Y51 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 5 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 92% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Oct 27, 2014
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core M-5Y51 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core M-5Y51 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core M-5Y51 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core M-5Y51
Oct 27th, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
38%
Turbo Frequency
2.6 GHz
63%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core M-5Y51 Oct 27th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 27th, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | LGA1151 |
5 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
