In Atomfall, the Core i9-9980XE is faster than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9980XE
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9980XE vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
184 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
138 FPS
85%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9980XE vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9980XE vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9980XE
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
18-core
100%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
11%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9980XE Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $1,979.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
