In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-9980HK is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9980HK
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 65% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 65% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-9980HK vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9980HK vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9980HK vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9980HK
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9980HK Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
