The Core i9-9960X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8150, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $1417.97 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-9960X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Up to 95% cheaper – $82.02 vs $1499.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 125 vs 165 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-9960X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i9-9960X vs FX-8150 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-9960X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$1499.99
5%
Value, $/FPS
$8.1/FPS
6%
Core i9-9960X vs FX-8150 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9960X vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9960X vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9960X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
22 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
36%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-9960X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
$1,684.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
165 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
22 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |