In Deathloop, the Core i9-9940X is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $1122 more expensive!
Core i9-9940X
No clear advantages
Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 87% cheaper – $167.00 vs $1288.88
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in Deathloop – $0.73 vs $5.83/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 125 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-9940X vs Core i5-11600KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
221 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
98%
Price, $
$1288.88
12%
Value, $/FPS
$5.83/FPS
13%
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9940X vs Core i5-11600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9940X vs Core i5-11600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
12 MB
62%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9940X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $1,387.00 | MSRP | $237.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
