In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-9920X is slightly slower than the Xeon L5640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9920X
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
Xeon L5640
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 60 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-9920X vs Xeon L5640: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
172 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
87%
Price, $
$698.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.06/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9920X vs Xeon L5640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9920X vs Xeon L5640 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon L5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9920X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon L5640 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $1,189.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
