In Control, the Core i9-9920X is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $411 more expensive!
Core i9-9920X
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 254 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 59% cheaper – $288.00 vs $698.95
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Control – $1.13 vs $2.80/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Core i9-9920X vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
249 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$698.95
41%
Value, $/FPS
$2.8/FPS
40%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9920X vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9920X vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
12-core
60%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
64%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9920X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $1,189.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
