In Atomfall, the Core i9-9920X is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900KF and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $150 more expensive!
Core i9-9920X
No clear advantages
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 215 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 21% cheaper – $549.00 vs $698.95
- Up to 21% cheaper
- Up to 31% better value in Atomfall – $2.23 vs $3.25/FPS
- Up to 31% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 125 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9920X vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
215 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
88%
Price, $
$698.95
78%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
69%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9920X vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9920X vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
12-core
50%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9920X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $1,189.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
