In Ghost of Tsushima, the Core i9-9920X is faster than the Core i7-980X. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $509 more expensive!
Core i9-9920X
- Up to 20% faster in Ghost of Tsushima – 130 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Ghost of Tsushima
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-980X
- Up to 73% cheaper – $189.95 vs $698.95
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Ghost of Tsushima – $1.75 vs $5.37/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Ghost of Tsushima
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 130 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Ghost of Tsushima FPS Calculator
Core i9-9920X vs Core i7-980X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$698.95
27%
Value, $/FPS
$5.37/FPS
33%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Average FPS
108 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
73 FPS
75%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9920X vs Core i7-980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9920X vs Core i7-980X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
62%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9920X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-980X Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $1,189.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 165W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
