In Atomfall, the Core i9-9920X is faster than the Core i7-930. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $392 more expensive!
Core i9-9920X
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-930
- Up to 56% cheaper – $307.29 vs $698.95
- Up to 56% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall – $1.64 vs $3.25/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 130 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9920X vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$698.95
43%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
50%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
187 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
87%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9920X vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9920X vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
42%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9920X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $1,189.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
