In Atomfall, the Core i9-9920X is slightly slower than the Core i5-13420H. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9920X
No clear advantages
Core i5-13420H
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 226 vs 215 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 45 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9920X vs Core i5-13420H: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
215 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
95%
Price, $
$698.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9920X vs Core i5-13420H in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9920X vs Core i5-13420H in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
51%
Core i5-13420H
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9920X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13420H Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $1,189.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | Intel BGA 1744 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
