Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1194 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Core i9-9920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-9920X - 236 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $76.78 vs $300.15
- Up to 77% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-9920X - $0.33 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 58 vs 165 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $300.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
236
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9920X | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |