In Deathloop, the Core i9-9900X is slightly slower than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900X
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 9 years and 6 months newer
Xeon E5520
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 80 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900X vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
221 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$499.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.26/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900X vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900X vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
42%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
56%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| $989.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 165W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
