In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900X is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $24 more expensive!
Core i9-9900X
No clear advantages
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 215 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 5% cheaper – $476.00 vs $499.99
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Up to 16% better value in Atomfall – $1.94 vs $2.32/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900X vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
215 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
88%
Price, $
$499.99
95%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
84%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$476
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.94/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900X vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900X vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
42%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $989.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
