In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900X is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $30 cheaper!
Core i9-9900X
- Up to 6% cheaper – $499.99 vs $529.90
- Up to 6% cheaper
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 215 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 6% better value in Atomfall – $2.18 vs $2.32/FPS
- Up to 6% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900X vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
215 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
88%
Price, $
$499.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
94%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.9
94%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900X vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900X vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
42%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
53%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $989.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
