In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-9900X is slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900X
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 209 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900X vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
173 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
82%
Price, $
$499.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.89/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900X vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900X vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
21%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $989.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
