In Rust, the Core i9-9900T is slightly faster than the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Up to 10% faster in Rust – 231 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3450
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $241.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
