In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-9900T is slightly slower than the Xeon W3670. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3670
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Xeon W3670: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Xeon W3670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Xeon W3670 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Aug 29th, 2010 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
