In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i9-9900T is slightly slower than the Xeon W3565. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Nov 01, 2009
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3565
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 241 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Xeon W3565: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Xeon W3565 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Xeon W3565 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon W3565
Nov 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3565 Nov 1st, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2009 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
