In Rust, the Core i9-9900T is slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 1700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 229 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Mar 02, 2017
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 1700X
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Ryzen 7 1700X: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
221 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
89%
Price, $
$195.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Ryzen 7 1700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Ryzen 7 1700X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 1700X Mar 2nd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
