In Atomfall, the Core i9-9900T is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 3600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 months and 14 days newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 2 months and 14 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Ryzen 5 3600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 3600X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Ryzen 5 3600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Ryzen 5 3600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 5 3600X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3600X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
