In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-9900T is slightly slower than the FX-8370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-8370
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 193 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
193 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
100%
Price, $
$252.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
