In Ghost of Tsushima, the Core i9-9900T is faster than the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Up to 21% faster in Ghost of Tsushima – 128 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Ghost of Tsushima
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
FX-8300
No clear advantages
Ghost of Tsushima FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
106 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
71 FPS
74%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
